Warscape
Daily briefing·· from today's news

Russia, Belarus vs Bulgaria, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania: Side A achieves its objectives after

In today's run Russia, Belarus attack Bulgaria, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania; the model ends in side a achieves its objectives after 27 days.

Attacks
Russia + Belarus
Defends
Bulgaria + Poland + Estonia +
Outcome
Side A achieves its objectives
Length
27 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Those stories name the sides in today's run.

The scenario we ran

Russia, Belarus attack Bulgaria, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States stays out, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 27 days
Rapid Mobilization
Attrition Phase
Stalemate
A
B
DAY 1◆ turning pointDAY 27
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Russia + Belarus
Bulgaria + Poland + Estonia +
4.3k
Personnel
1.1k
42
Tanks
10
83
Aircraft
22
35
Artillery
11
Territory: Russia + Belarus +16 cells · Bulgaria + Poland + Estonia + -16 cells. Cohesion at the end: 71% vs 83%.

Result: Side A achieves its objectives after 27 simulated days (capital captured). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 4,275 for Russia + Belarus and 1,130 for Bulgaria + Poland + Estonia +.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then attrition phase from day 8, then stalemate from day 21, then contested front from day 24, then opening offensive from day 25.

Turning points:

  • Day 12: Turning point: a shift in momentum. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward Russia + Belarus: a combination of local factors.
  • Day 25: Turning point: a shift in momentum. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward Russia + Belarus: a combination of local factors.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Russia + Belarusfavours Bulgaria + Poland + Estonia + ▶
Sea & air lift
0 vs 20,796.
Mobilisation
178,984 vs 48,515.
Deployed combat power
192 vs 89 model units.
Long-range strikes
20% (Russia + Belarus) vs 0% (Bulg
Air situation
59%.
Logistics
68% vs 52%.
Political cohesion
72% vs 84%.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Russia + Belarus
Capture the capital of Lithuaniaachieved
Secure a border corridor inside Lithuaniaachieved
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%0%
Side B objectives · Bulgaria + Poland + Estonia +
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territoryachieved
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%0%
Restore pre-war borders0%
  • Sea & air lift (favoured Side B): Troops brought into the theatre by lift: 0 vs 20,796.
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side A): Reservists mobilised: 178,984 vs 48,515.
  • Deployed combat power (favoured Side A): Average deployed combat power: 192 vs 89 model units.
  • Long-range strikes (favoured Side B): Final logistics degradation from strikes: 20% (Russia + Belarus) vs 0% (Bulgaria + Poland + Estonia +); interception rates 38% / 73%.
  • Air situation (favoured Side A): Average share of air control for Russia + Belarus: 59%.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

  • Poland vs Belarus: the model ended that one in ceasefire, front frozen after 181 days.
  • Russia vs Estonia: the model ended that one in side a achieves its objectives after 34 days.
  • Russia vs Finland: the model ended that one in side a achieves its objectives after 185 days.
  • Russia vs Latvia: the model ended that one in side a achieves its objectives after 49 days.

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.