Warscape
Daily briefing·· from today's news

Russia, Belarus vs United States, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania: Narrow victory for United States

In today's run Russia, Belarus attack United States, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania; the model ends in narrow victory for united states + poland + estonia + after 365 days.

Attacks
Russia + Belarus
Defends
United States + Poland + Estonia +
Outcome
Narrow victory for United States + Poland + Estonia +
Length
365 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Those stories name the sides in today's run.

The scenario we ran

Russia, Belarus attack United States, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States participates, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 365 days
Stalemate
Stalemate
A
B
DAY 1◆ turning pointDAY 365
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Russia + Belarus
United States + Poland + Estonia +
91.8k
Personnel
45.5k
678
Tanks
557
1,375
Aircraft
2,084
417
Artillery
287
Territory: Russia + Belarus -2 cells · United States + Poland + Estonia + +2 cells. Cohesion at the end: 38% vs 53%.

Result: Narrow victory for United States + Poland + Estonia + after 365 simulated days (duration limit reached). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 91,844 for Russia + Belarus and 45,485 for United States + Poland + Estonia +.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then attrition phase from day 8, then stalemate from day 21, then contested front from day 97, then attrition phase from day 101.

Turning points:

  • Day 12: Turning point: a shift in momentum. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward United States + Poland + Estonia +: a combination of local factors.
  • Day 98: Turning point: Offensive slows in the central sector. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward United States + Poland + Estonia +: supply efficiency has fallen and the air situation has become contested.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Russia + Belarusfavours United States + Poland + Estonia + ▶
Sea & air lift
0 vs 1,024,054.
Mobilisation
2,731,144 vs 986,551.
Air situation
27%.
Deployed combat power
317 vs 470 model units.
Economic resilience
0.95 vs 0.76.
Logistics
52% vs 63%.
Political cohesion
54% vs 62%.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Russia + Belarus
Capture the capital of Lithuania100%
Secure a border corridor inside Lithuania58%
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%0%
Side B objectives · United States + Poland + Estonia +
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territoryachieved
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%0%
Restore pre-war borders0%
  • Sea & air lift (favoured Side B): Troops brought into the theatre by lift: 0 vs 1,024,054.
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side A): Reservists mobilised: 2,731,144 vs 986,551.
  • Air situation (favoured Side B): Average share of air control for Russia + Belarus: 27%.
  • Deployed combat power (favoured Side B): Average deployed combat power: 317 vs 470 model units.
  • Economic resilience (favoured Side A): Average economic stability index: 0.95 vs 0.76.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

  • Poland vs Belarus: the model ended that one in ceasefire, front frozen after 181 days.
  • Russia vs Estonia: the model ended that one in side a achieves its objectives after 34 days.
  • Russia vs Finland: the model ended that one in side a achieves its objectives after 185 days.
  • Russia vs Latvia: the model ended that one in side a achieves its objectives after 49 days.

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.