Warscape
Daily briefing·· from today's news

Russia, Belarus vs Germany, Poland: Side A achieves its objectives after 241 days

In today's run Russia, Belarus attack Germany, Poland; the model ends in side a achieves its objectives after 241 days.

Attacks
Russia + Belarus
Defends
Germany + Poland
Outcome
Side A achieves its objectives
Length
241 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Those stories name the sides in today's run.

The scenario we ran

Russia, Belarus attack Germany, Poland in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States stays out, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 241 days
A
B
DAY 1◆ turning pointDAY 241
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Russia + Belarus
Germany + Poland
74.5k
Personnel
22.1k
467
Tanks
140
387
Aircraft
244
440
Artillery
68
Territory: Russia + Belarus +77 cells · Germany + Poland -77 cells. Cohesion at the end: 58% vs 48%.

Result: Side A achieves its objectives after 241 simulated days (capital captured). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 74,507 for Russia + Belarus and 22,132 for Germany + Poland.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then contested front from day 4, then attrition phase from day 13, then stalemate from day 27, then attrition phase from day 29.

Turning points:

  • Day 12: Turning point: a shift in momentum. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward Germany + Poland: a combination of local factors.
  • Day 39: Turning point: a shift in momentum. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward Germany + Poland: a combination of local factors.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Russia + Belarusfavours Germany + Poland ▶
Mobilisation
1,619,178 vs 122,884.
Air situation
76%.
Deployed combat power
254 vs 108 model units.
Logistics
82% vs 68%.
Economic resilience
0.97 vs 0.86.
Political cohesion
63% vs 64%.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Russia + Belarus
Capture the capital of Polandachieved
Secure a border corridor inside Polandachieved
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%0%
Side B objectives · Germany + Poland
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territory0%
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%0%
Restore pre-war borders0%
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side A): Reservists mobilised: 1,619,178 vs 122,884.
  • Air situation (favoured Side A): Average share of air control for Russia + Belarus: 76%.
  • Deployed combat power (favoured Side A): Average deployed combat power: 254 vs 108 model units.
  • Logistics (favoured Side A): Average front-line supply efficiency: 82% vs 68%.
  • Economic resilience (favoured Side A): Average economic stability index: 0.97 vs 0.86.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

  • Poland vs Belarus: the model ended that one in ceasefire, front frozen after 181 days.
  • Russia vs Poland: the model ended that one in partial objective achieved after 365 days.

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.