Warscape
Daily briefing·· from today's news

Russia, Belarus vs Ukraine: Narrow victory for Russia + Belarus after 341 days

In today's run Russia, Belarus attack Ukraine; the model ends in narrow victory for russia + belarus after 341 days.

Attacks
Russia + Belarus
Defends
Ukraine
Outcome
Narrow victory for Russia + Belarus
Length
341 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Those stories name the sides in today's run.

The scenario we ran

Russia, Belarus attack Ukraine in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States stays out, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 341 days
Stalemate
A
B
DAY 1DAY 341
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Russia + Belarus
Ukraine
125k
Personnel
50.5k
1,063
Tanks
110
691
Aircraft
88
604
Artillery
120
Territory: Russia + Belarus +4 cells · Ukraine -4 cells. Cohesion at the end: 41% vs 72%.

Result: Narrow victory for Russia + Belarus after 341 simulated days (prolonged stalemate). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 124,913 for Russia + Belarus and 50,548 for Ukraine.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then attrition phase from day 8, then stalemate from day 21, then ceasefire from day 341.

Turning points:

  • The engine detected no turning points in this run.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Russia + Belarusfavours Ukraine ▶
Mobilisation
2,513,130 vs 439,541.
Air situation
81%.
Political cohesion
52% vs 78%.
Deployed combat power
254 vs 275 model units.
Economic resilience
0.96 vs 0.95.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Russia + Belarus
Capture the capital of Ukraine0%
Secure a border corridor inside Ukraine10%
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%6%
Side B objectives · Ukraine
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territoryachieved
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%0%
Restore pre-war borders0%
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side A): Reservists mobilised: 2,513,130 vs 439,541.
  • Air situation (favoured Side A): Average share of air control for Russia + Belarus: 81%.
  • Political cohesion (favoured Side B): Average cohesion: 52% vs 78%.
  • Deployed combat power (favoured Side B): Average deployed combat power: 254 vs 275 model units.
  • Economic resilience (favoured Side A): Average economic stability index: 0.96 vs 0.95.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.