Warscape
Daily briefing·· evergreen scenario

Russia, Belarus vs Poland, Germany, France, United Kingdom: Partial objective achieved after 365 days

In today's run Russia, Belarus attack Poland, Germany, France, United Kingdom; the model ends in partial objective achieved after 365 days.

Attacks
Russia + Belarus
Defends
Poland + Germany + France +
Outcome
Partial objective achieved
Length
365 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Nothing in the feeds mapped onto a scenario the engine can stage, so today's run is the evergreen scenario Europe without the United States.

The scenario we ran

Russia, Belarus attack Poland, Germany, France, United Kingdom in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States stays out, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 365 days
Stalemate
A
B
DAY 1◆ turning pointDAY 365
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Russia + Belarus
Poland + Germany + France +
123k
Personnel
38.1k
837
Tanks
259
767
Aircraft
720
612
Artillery
138
Territory: Russia + Belarus +16 cells · Poland + Germany + France + -16 cells. Cohesion at the end: 33% vs 57%.

Result: Partial objective achieved after 365 simulated days (duration limit reached). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 122,865 for Russia + Belarus and 38,076 for Poland + Germany + France +.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then contested front from day 4, then attrition phase from day 13, then stalemate from day 27, then end state from day 365.

Turning points:

  • Day 12: Turning point: a shift in momentum. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward Poland + Germany + France +: a combination of local factors.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Russia + Belarusfavours Poland + Germany + France + ▶
Sea & air lift
0 vs 83,123.
Mobilisation
2,288,292 vs 168,753.
Air situation
64%.
Logistics
89% vs 64%.
Economic resilience
0.95 vs 0.76.
Political cohesion
50% vs 67%.
Deployed combat power
232 vs 175 model units.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Russia + Belarus
Capture the capital of Poland33%
Secure a border corridor inside Poland69%
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%0%
Side B objectives · Poland + Germany + France +
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territoryachieved
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%0%
Restore pre-war borders0%
  • Sea & air lift (favoured Side B): Troops brought into the theatre by lift: 0 vs 83,123.
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side A): Reservists mobilised: 2,288,292 vs 168,753.
  • Air situation (favoured Side A): Average share of air control for Russia + Belarus: 64%.
  • Logistics (favoured Side A): Average front-line supply efficiency: 89% vs 64%.
  • Economic resilience (favoured Side A): Average economic stability index: 0.95 vs 0.76.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

  • Poland vs Belarus: the model ended that one in ceasefire, front frozen after 181 days.
  • Russia vs Poland: the model ended that one in partial objective achieved after 365 days.

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.