Warscape
Daily briefing·· from today's news

Russia, Belarus vs Ukraine: Ceasefire, front frozen after 360 days

In today's run Russia, Belarus attack Ukraine; the model ends in ceasefire, front frozen after 360 days.

Attacks
Russia + Belarus
Defends
Ukraine
Outcome
Ceasefire, front frozen
Length
360 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Those stories name the sides in today's run.

The scenario we ran

Russia, Belarus attack Ukraine in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States stays out, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 360 days
Stalemate
A
B
DAY 1DAY 360
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Russia + Belarus
Ukraine
107k
Personnel
57.6k
475
Tanks
90
569
Aircraft
75
541
Artillery
106
Territory: Russia + Belarus +3 cells · Ukraine -3 cells. Cohesion at the end: 42% vs 67%.

Result: Ceasefire, front frozen after 360 simulated days (prolonged stalemate). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 106,528 for Russia + Belarus and 57,626 for Ukraine.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then attrition phase from day 8, then stalemate from day 21, then ceasefire from day 360.

Turning points:

  • The engine detected no turning points in this run.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Russia + Belarusfavours Ukraine ▶
Mobilisation
2,362,334 vs 407,468.
Air situation
79%.
Political cohesion
53% vs 75%.
Deployed combat power
199 vs 260 model units.
Economic resilience
0.96 vs 0.94.
Logistics
55% vs 56%.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Russia + Belarus
Capture the capital of Ukraine0%
Secure a border corridor inside Ukraine7%
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%0%
Side B objectives · Ukraine
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territoryachieved
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%0%
Restore pre-war borders0%
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side A): Reservists mobilised: 2,362,334 vs 407,468.
  • Air situation (favoured Side A): Average share of air control for Russia + Belarus: 79%.
  • Political cohesion (favoured Side B): Average cohesion: 53% vs 75%.
  • Deployed combat power (favoured Side B): Average deployed combat power: 199 vs 260 model units.
  • Economic resilience (favoured Side A): Average economic stability index: 0.96 vs 0.94.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.