Warscape
Daily briefing·· from today's news

Ukraine vs United States, Russia: Decisive victory for United States + Russia after 231 days

In today's run Ukraine attack United States, Russia; the model ends in decisive victory for united states + russia after 231 days.

Attacks
Ukraine
Defends
United States + Russia
Outcome
Decisive victory for United States + Russia
Length
231 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Those stories name the sides in today's run.

The scenario we ran

Ukraine attack United States, Russia in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States participates, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 231 days
Stalemate
Stalemate
A
B
DAY 1◆ turning pointDAY 231
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Ukraine
United States + Russia
19.9k
Personnel
74.0k
73
Tanks
555
68
Aircraft
1,321
77
Artillery
248
Territory: Ukraine -36 cells · United States + Russia +36 cells. Cohesion at the end: 49% vs 47%.

Result: Decisive victory for United States + Russia after 231 simulated days (attacker abandons the campaign). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 19,898 for Ukraine and 73,973 for United States + Russia.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then attrition phase from day 8, then stalemate from day 21, then contested front from day 49, then attrition phase from day 56.

Turning points:

  • Day 205: Turning point: Supply crisis for United States + Russia. This moment mattered because momentum shifted durably toward United States + Russia: overextended supply lines.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Ukrainefavours United States + Russia ▶
Sea & air lift
0 vs 882,567.
Air situation
17%.
Deployed combat power
165 vs 716 model units.
Mobilisation
711,846 vs 1,702,319.
Political cohesion
65% vs 53%.
Logistics
63% vs 66%.
Economic resilience
0.83 vs 0.84.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Ukraine
Capture the capital of Russia0%
Secure a border corridor inside Russia0%
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%0%
Side B objectives · United States + Russia
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territoryachieved
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%0%
Restore pre-war bordersachieved
  • Sea & air lift (favoured Side B): Troops brought into the theatre by lift: 0 vs 882,567.
  • Air situation (favoured Side B): Average share of air control for Ukraine: 17%.
  • Deployed combat power (favoured Side B): Average deployed combat power: 165 vs 716 model units.
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side B): Reservists mobilised: 711,846 vs 1,702,319.
  • Political cohesion (favoured Side A): Average cohesion: 65% vs 53%.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

  • Russia vs Ukraine: the model ended that one in ceasefire, front frozen after 304 days.

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.