Warscape
Daily briefing·· evergreen scenario

Azerbaijan vs Armenia: Defender holds after 365 days

In today's run Azerbaijan attack Armenia; the model ends in defender holds after 365 days.

Attacks
Azerbaijan
Defends
Armenia
Outcome
Defender holds
Length
365 days

What happened today

Today's defence and geopolitics headlines, in the outlets' own words (linked):

Nothing in the feeds mapped onto a scenario the engine can stage, so today's run is the evergreen scenario Caucasus conflict.

The scenario we ran

Azerbaijan attack Armenia in autumn, mobilization full / partial, the United States stays out, nuclear weapons disabled, 365-day limit. Everything else is the engine's realistic default.

How the model played it out

War timeline · 365 days
Stalemate
A
B
DAY 1DAY 365
Phases are the engine's own labels. Lanes show each side's operational tempo: bright = attacking, dim = pausing or defending.
Losses within the model · aggregate
Azerbaijan
Armenia
4.3k
Personnel
5.0k
29
Tanks
6
29
Aircraft
8
21
Artillery
10
Territory: Azerbaijan 0 cells · Armenia 0 cells. Cohesion at the end: 45% vs 32%.

Result: Defender holds after 365 simulated days (duration limit reached). Aggregate personnel losses within the model: 4,272 for Azerbaijan and 5,044 for Armenia.

The war moved through initial strike from day 1, then rapid mobilization from day 3, then attrition phase from day 8, then stalemate from day 21, then end state from day 365.

Turning points:

  • The engine detected no turning points in this run.

What decided it

What decided it · separation between the sides
◀ favours Azerbaijanfavours Armenia ▶
Logistics
13% vs 45%.
Air situation
65%.
Deployed combat power
20 vs 12 model units.
Mobilisation
259,293 vs 153,378.
Political cohesion
58% vs 43%.
Economic resilience
0.96 vs 0.93.
Bar length is the engine's normalised difference on that factor over the whole war; direction shows who it favoured.
Side A objectives · Azerbaijan
Capture the capital of Armenia0%
Secure a border corridor inside Armenia0%
Reduce opposing deployed combat capacity below 50%0%
Side B objectives · Armenia
Retain at least 90% of pre-war territoryachieved
Reduce the attacker's offensive capacity below 55%6%
Restore pre-war bordersachieved
  • Logistics (favoured Side B): Average front-line supply efficiency: 13% vs 45%.
  • Air situation (favoured Side A): Average share of air control for Azerbaijan: 65%.
  • Deployed combat power (favoured Side A): Average deployed combat power: 20 vs 12 model units.
  • Mobilisation (favoured Side A): Reservists mobilised: 259,293 vs 153,378.
  • Political cohesion (favoured Side A): Average cohesion: 58% vs 43%.

The same countries, one on one

WARSCAPE keeps a permanent page for every land border in Europe, each holding its own simulated war:

Try it yourself

Open the exact run and scrub the timeline, ask why at any event, or branch an alternate timeline from a turning point. Or change one assumption in the builder and run it again.

Sources and limits

This is a model result on public, aggregate, country-level data under the stated assumptions. It is not a prediction, and no operational information is used.

Model-generated simulation on public, country-level data. Not a prediction. Headlines are linked and summarised, never reproduced. Assembled from the engine's report.